Denial or frame up is a standard defense ploy in most prosecutions for
violation of the Dangerous Drugs Law. As such, it has been viewed by the
court with disfavor for it can just as easily be concocted.39
It should not accord a redoubtable sanctuary to a person accused of
drug dealing unless the evidence of such frame up is clear and
convincing.40
Without proof of any intent on the part of the police officers to
falsely impute appellant in the commission of a crime, the presumption
of regularity in the performance of official duty and the principle that
the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses are
entitled to great respect, deserve to prevail over the bare denials and
self-serving claims of appellant that he had been framed up.41
Neither can appellant’s claim of alleged extortion by the police
operatives be entertained. Absent any proof, appellant’s assertion of
extortion allegedly committed by the police officers could not be
successfully interposed. It remains one of those standard, worn-out, and
impotent excuses of malefactors prosecuted for drug offenses. What
appellant could have done was to prove his allegation and not just
casually air it
No comments:
Post a Comment